.
Feedback

On Being Attracted to Someone Else, Part III

In this posting, Deborah Leeds looks at relationship from a new paradigm, based on the work of Stan Tatkin. Josh Gressel's comments will return next week.

Hello Patch readers:

A few weeks ago, I took up all the space in the posting and left Deborah no room.  This week she returns the favor! I'll be commenting on this column next week.

Josh

Dear Josh, 

In continuing our dialog about what to do and what does it mean if I am attracted to someone outside my marriage, something struck me that has a different slant. I have begun reading Wired For Love by Stan Tatkin. Although I have not gotten too far with it yet, it has me pondering this question: Why are we in relationship? Is it “about me” or is there a process to be served by being in relationship that is more important than I might know? 

Tatkin, a psychologist working with couples, has taken the current discoveries in three fields: neuroscience (which shows us the physiological basis for some of the impulses and reactions that drive our relationships), attachment theory (the biological need to attach and bond to others,) and “human arousal” (defined not as in sexual arousal, but as our “moment to moment ability to manage our energy, alertness, and readiness to engage”) and has integrated them to provide advice and suggestions to help couples grow healthy, secure, happy relationships. 

Why am I talking about this here? Because, according to Tatkin and others, these studies tell us that we are wired to be in, and benefit from, secure relationships. That absent the secure relational base of an intimate relationship we are missing that which helps us function and feel better as individuals. He says: “Who among us doesn’t want to be loved? Finally to be able to be ourselves just as we are, to feel cherished, cared for, protected - this has been the pursuit of humans since the beginning of recorded time. We are social animals. We depend on other people. We need other people.” 

This is a real change from the perspective that has been maintained in the past several decades, wherein an individual’s needs, preferences, and drives are the priority, and relationships are meant to serve the individual. This is a huge paradigm shift.  

When a woman or a man is attracted to someone outside their relationship, it could be a flash kind of interest (perhaps more true for males). But it can also be serious enough that it raises significant questions about their relationship. Someone may measure their happiness, satisfaction, and the way they experience themselves in their committed relationship against this new attraction.  It can look like: “I’ve changed, you haven’t, and I don’t think you fit me anymore.” 

Old paradigm: the “how I feel and what I need” is my guiding principle. “I don’t feel fulfilled here; I love you but the relationship isn’t giving me what I need....” In this paradigm, we assign alot of what isn’t working to our partner. We begin to withdraw, look elsewhere, grow resentful. Rather than understanding relational patterns, and the relational wounds that underly them, we leave, be it physically or emotionally. We look for our individual well-being in what is, perhaps unconsciously, a backdrop in which “I ultimately stand alone”, and must act on my own behalf. 

Emerging paradigm: In order for an individual to be happy, we need our relationships to be secure places in which both individuals can heal and thrive. We are learning that the benefits that come from having a secure, connected, caring base give us the opportunity to heal “relationship wounds” that come from childhood and interfere with our capacities for mature, healthy relationships in adulthood. This is the potential of committed relationships. Understanding this, I want to take care of my relationship, learn about it, and be an ally to be my partner, even when it is challenging. I am learning to find my best well-being, fully as my individual self, through the process of being in relationship. 

I think that we rarely consider in a conscious way  “Why am I in relationship”?Aside from who I like, what I want, and how it feels to be together, what do we believe about relationship? What is it’s purpose or potential? Think about it: we know exactly what to do to have healthy oral hygiene, but what do we understand about this most significant relationship in our lives? 

In your recent comments, you said: “I am preaching here a doctrine of truth and trust. Trust the truth of who you are. Trust that you really did choose the right person to be with and if you share yourself fully with him or her, you and your relationship will grow as a result.” 

I think that we need to know why we are in our relationships and marriages. If we believe it is to enrich our lives, but with the sense that  underneath it all “I” comes first and last, we will make decisions following that sense of self-preservation. 
If we believe, as Tatkin and others are saying, that caring for and growing our relationships is ultimately the way to care for ourselves, then our decisions will align with your perspective: that honesty and authenticity will maintain respect and vitality in our relationships, and that a healthy relationship is an essential kind of self-care. 

Who knew?

Deborah

Do you have a question about your marriage or relationship? Is there a particular topic on relationships or individual psychological issues you would like addressed in this blog? Ask Josh in the comments below or email him at josh@joshgressel.com.

Deborah Leeds, MFT, is a couples and individual therapist with offices in Pleasant Hill and Berkeley, CA. Visit her website at deborahleeds.com

Josh Gressel, Ph.D., is a couples and individual therapist based in Pleasant Hill, CA. Visit his website at joshgressel.com.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pleasant Hill Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Emily Henry (Editor) May 21, 2013 at 09:27 am
Yes, Ken, it looks like a lot of fun! Here's information about the June 29 Pleasant Hill Family CampRead More Out: http://pleasanthill.patch.com/groups/local-connections/p/pleasant-hill-families-to-camp-out-june-29
Ken Housfeld May 21, 2013 at 06:29 am
This is the fourth Relay in Pleasant Hill. Each year there have been more people attending. Come seeRead More what you have been missing.
Emily Henry (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 04:29 pm
If you're participating in Relay for Life, inspire others and share your story by starting a blog onRead More Pleasant Hill Patch! http://pleasanthill.patch.com/blogs/new
Russell Elkins May 19, 2013 at 06:37 pm
The Staples discounts are not really all that helpful. You can usually find lower prices atRead More Wallmart or on Amazon and you must spend a large amount (a couple hundred dollars) all in one month to get any cash back reward at all. If you spend money on school supplies spread out, like $150/mo, you do not accumulate enough in any one month to get any reward at all. The deal sounds great, but I've found it completely useless and frustrating. I think it's a ploy for positive press only, and of little help to a teacher.
ROBERT E. FISHBACK May 17, 2013 at 06:06 am
Teacher supplies is going on all over the country. I would suggest using the local PTA's to solicitRead More help from the parents.
maria jimenez March 13, 2013 at 04:48 pm
felicidades Edna te deceo mucha suerte
Maria Esparza March 13, 2013 at 12:35 pm
Edna we are so proud of you!!! We are with you all the way! Love Tere and family!!!
Dive Turn Work January 9, 2013 at 02:25 am
I didn't see this coming. Good for them. I hope it's an eye-opening experience for people and theyRead More continue donating on a regular basis.
tommyo May 5, 2013 at 09:17 pm
Why is this about politics?
tommyo May 5, 2013 at 09:16 pm
Sean, don't say "Winchester", people will start freaking out about guns and blame Dick'sRead More sporting goods all over again.
tommyo May 5, 2013 at 09:14 pm
Really? Show me the figures on this. The Dome has major infestation problems. It would require aRead More complete overhall and gutting. It is much cheaper to "rip and replace".